QUESTIONS OF STUDY OF POSTSTRUCTURALIST PARADIGM IN THE CONTEMPORARY ERIOD

Abstract

The article discusses some aspects of the study of the main paradigms of structuralism. It is noted that deconstruction, negation of centricity, integrity, homogeneity and nomadic concepts as the basis of poststructuralism, explain the characteristics of this method in modern Western philosophy. The author emphasizes that this approach, of its kind, took the place of the materialist and idealistic dialectic. The author, based on the results of the study, comes to the conclusion that confrontation between structuralism and dialectics has grown into poststructuralism. He notes that the dialectic law of «denial of denial», in some way resembles «poststructuralism», which, while denying structuralism, recreates the philosophy of movement and change at a new stage.