DOLLS OF THE MEZHYGIRSKY VERTEP IN THE CREATIVITY OF ARTISTS-BOICHUKISTS OF THE 1920 S

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35619/ucpmk.50.934

Keywords:

Boychuk artists, avant-garde, puppet theater, nativity scene, puppet authors, sculpture, artistic and figurative features, scenography, decorative and applied art, composition, 20 th century, Ukraine

Abstract

The purpose is to identify the artists and sculptors involved in the design of theatrical puppets and the development of the Mezhyhirsk Nativity Scene repertoire, and to outline the list of the latter's characters, characterize their stylistic and artistic-figurative features within the framework of avant-garde scenography.
Results. So, the Mezhyhirsk Nativity Scene puppet theater was founded in the fall of 1923 on the initiative of the political instructor, representative of the People's Commissariat of Education, and art critic Pavlo Horbenko. It was supported by the head of the institution Vasyl Sedlyar, sculptor, professor Yevhen Sahaidachny, and student activists 3 Ilko Zaika, Mykola Tsivchynsky, Dmytro Holovko.
Most likely, in addition to Yevhen Sahaidachny, Vasyl Sedlyar's wife Oksana Pavlenko and Mykhailo Boychuk's wife Sofia Nalepynska-Boychuk were involved in the development of graphic sketches of the nativity scene puppets.
The choice of characters was based on a synthesis of the active figures of medieval mysteries and traditional Ukrainian folk nativity scenes (such as God, Tsar, Archangel, Pastor, representatives of various professions and people from the common people). But to spite the day, they were supplemented with foreign heroes, mostly famous capitalists, interpreted, albeit with humor and sarcasm, but mostly with a negative connotation.
Among them are MacDonald (Ramsey MacDonald), Lord Curzon (George Curzon), sometimes he was passed off as Chamberlain, French diplomat (Paul Deschanel), American representative (Hugo Stinnes), General Ludendorff (Erich Ludendorff), Occasional diplomat (Woodrow Wilson), Occasional capitalists (Gustav Stresemann, Raymond Poincaré), some of whom were identified by the theater as political world figures of the 1920s in the last decade.
In total, during the years 192331924, while the Moscow Art Theater troupe existed, about 30 nativity dolls were designed (21
are available, several are known from photos, 1 from a graphic design, 1 blank), and 7 heads for them, made of wood based on
prototypes of African sculpture with enlarged, exaggerated, mostly in a cubist-futuristic avant-garde manner with recognizable facial features, as well as 1 plywood nativity house (30 items in total). The latter was designed as a one-story one, because in it the authors tried to equalize sacred and profane images. In addition, a white canvas was stretched in front of the «shopka» (nativity scene), behind which the characters of the Far Eastern shadow theater were demonstrated, which complemented the performances. The house was made according to the memoirs of M. Tsivchinsky, a local Mezhyhirya master under his leadership, and the production of dolls was directly related to prof. E. Sahaidachny and the above-mentioned representatives of the student community.
Thus, these future artists of ceramics and heating engineering developed a repertoire of puppet nativity scenes, including individual mise-en-scenes and plays. They were tested on residents of villages near Mezhyhirya 3 Novy and Stary Petrivtsy, as well as Gostomel, Zhytomyr, Kyiv, Pryluky, Kharkiv, performing before Red Army soldiers in garrisons, peasants, townspeople in culture clubs and various reading rooms. Textile clothing for dolls was selected removable, some characters were somehow reshaped, transformed.
Research methodology. The study used the following scientific tools: the principle of scientific reconstruction, art history and culturology approaches, ontological, axiological, hermeneutic, historical-genetic, historical-chronological, comparative, socio-cultural, typological, iconographic and method of analysis of works of art.
Novelty. The novelty of the study lies in the clarification of information about the author of the idea of creating the Mezhyhirsk Nativity Scene, the artistic characters of this theater, and the house The practical significance. The results obtained make it possible to comprehend the sources of inspiration for individual cubo-futuristic searches for the scenography of avant-garde forms of dolls of the Mezhyhirsk Nativity Scene of 192331924. and to realize its historical, cultural and art-historical significance among the invaluable heritage of the Boychukists, as a whole layer of the «Shooted Renaissance» of Ukraine of the early 20 th century, and to reassess it taking into account the high assessment of Mykhailo Starytsky's granddaughter Iryna Steshenko, representatives of the «Berezil» theater, in particular Les Kurbas, etc. 

Author Biographies

Ganna KRIUKOVA, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv Metropolitan University

Associate Professor at the Department of the Department of Fine Arts 

Oksana POPINOVA, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv Metropolitan University

старший викладач кафедри образотворчого мистецтва

References

1. Beketova I. Mezhyhirskyi keramichnyi tekhnikum (z istorii diialnosti). Muzeina zbirka robit «mezhyhirtsiv» 1920-kh rokiv. Boichukivski studii: naukovyi zhurnal. Vinnytsia : TOV Tvory, 2023. Vyp. 1. S. 6–17.

2. Bilokin S. Boichuk ta yoho shkola. Kyiv : Mystetstvo, 2017. 256 s.: il. 3. Herasymenko N. O. Kyivskyi Mezhyhirskyi Spaso-Preobrazhenskyi monastyr [Arkhivovano 17 serpnia 2016 u Wayback Machine]. Entsyklopediia istorii Ukrainy: u 10 t. / redkol.: V. A. Smolii (holova) ta in.; Instytut istorii Ukrainy NAN Ukrainy. Kyiv : Naukova dumka, 2007. T. 4: Ka–Kom. S. 259.

4. Horbenko P. Pro lialkovyi teatr u robitnychomu klubi. Kultrobitnyk. 1929. № 7. S. 28-31

5. Horbenko P. Revoliutsiinyi lialkovyi teatr. Kyiv : Knyhospilka, 1924. 40 s.

6. Horbenko P., Sedliar V. Do pytannia pro budovu mystetsko-industrialnoi shkoly (mirkuvannia y fakty). Shliakh prosvity. 1924. № 10. TsDAMLMU, f. 990 spr. 866, ark. 1–5.

7. Hrytsai M. S. Lialkovyi narodnyi teatr-vertep za radianskoho chasu. Narodna tvorchist ta etnohrafiia. 1962. № 3. S. 106–110.

8. Demosfenus A. Osnovnыe tendentsyy kukolnoho teatra Evropы y Vostoka. Henezys. Sovremennost: аvtoreferat … kand. yskusstvovedenyia: 17.00.02 / Demosfenus Afanasyia Khrystotulu. Kyev : Yn-t ys, 1997. 17 s.

9. Zaika A. Mezhyhirskyi vertep, abo Revoliutsiinyi lialkovyi teatr. Lialka Baba Maryna. 30.12.2014. URl: http://be-inart.com/post/view/843 [znyshchenyi arkhiv].

10. Zaika A. Na tli Mezhyhirskykh kruch: zabuti storinky istorii Kyievo-Mezhyhiria. Kyiv : A+S, 2016. 528 s.: il.

11. Zinovieva T. Evoliutsiia skhidnoukrainskoho vertepu : аvtoreferat … kand. mystetstvoznavstva: 17.00.00. Odesa, 2006. 20 s.

12. Ivanova D. O. Formuvannia khudozhno-tekhnichnykh pryntsypiv profesiinoho teatru lialok na praktytsi teatru «Revoliutsiinyi vertep» pry Mezhyhirskomu khudozhno-keramichnomu tekhnikumi (1923–1924 rr.). Science and Education a New Dimension. Humanities and Social Sciences, III(7), Issue : 42, 2015. P. 108–111.

13. Kuzmuk O. Mezhyhirska starovyna: narysy z istorii Kyievo-Mezhyhirskoho v imia Preobrazhennia Hospodnoho cholovichoho monastyria v XVI–XVIII stolittiakh / Nats. Kyievo-Pecher. ist.-kult. zapovidnyk, Tsentr pamiatkoznavstva NAN Ukrainy i UTOPIK; Tsentr. derzh. ist. arkhiv Ukrainy, m. Kyiv. Kyiv, 2014. 624 s.

14. Kurbas L. Vertep na ahitatsiinii sluzhbi. Hlobus. 1923. № 4. 9 s.

15. Lobanova I. Dolia fundatora Kharkivskoi lialkovoi shkoly. Lialka na konu. Kyiv : DUKh I LITERA, 2021. S. 25–32.

16. Luhova T. Avanhardnyi vertepnyi teatr na pochatku KhKh stolittia. Khudozhnii avanhard: poshuk novoi mystetskoi paradyhmy: mat-ly I Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii. 8–10 kvitnia 2015 r. / Ministerstvo osvity i nauky Ukrainy. Kherson : Khersonskyi natsionalnyi tekhnichnyi universytet. S. 28–30.

17. Luhova T. Ukrainskyi vertep: syntaktyka, semantyka, prahmatyka, dynamika. Odesa: Odeskyi natsionalnyi politekhnichnyi universytet, 2006. 465 c.: il.

18. Mezhyhirskyi vertep «Revoliutsiinyi lialkovyi teatr» https://www.tmf-museum.com/revolyucijnij-lyalkovijteatr (data zvernennia: 27.01.2025 r.).

19. Mezhyhirskyi mystetsko-keramichnyi tekhnikum. Buklet. Kyiv : Drukarnia K.Kh.I., 1927. [Bez sutsilnoi pahinatsii].

20. Molyn V. D. Yevhen Sahaidachnyi v istorii ukrainskoho mystetstva KhKh stolittia: shtrykhy do portreta. Visnyk Zakarpatskoi akademii mystetstv. 2017. Vyp. 9. S. 36–44.

21. Pavlenko H. Revoliutsiinyi lialkovyi teatr. Hortaiuchy storinky istorii. Kyiv : NAKKKiM, 2011. S. 37–40.

22. Rudenko S. Politychnyi teatr Mezhyhiria: zanurennia u 1920-ti roky. Lialka na konu. Kyiv : DUKh I LITERA, 2021. S. 12–25.

23. FDMTMiK Ukr, R. 4899. Arkhiv «Vertep». Steshenko I. Spohady pro vertep. 8 ark. Rukopys.

24. FDMTMiK Ukr, R. 10818 s. Arkhiv «Vertep». Mezhyhirskyi lialkovyi teatr. Shakhivets I. Korotka zapyska. Z dosvidu Vseukrainskoho Pokazovoho lialkovoho teatru. 2 ark. Rukopys.

25. FDMTMiK. Foto foto vertepnykh lialok Mezhyhirskoho teatru 1923–1926 rr., yaki ne zberehlysia.

26. FDMTMiK Ukr. Tsivchynskyi M. Narysy z istorii Mezhyhirskoho vertepu. Rukopys. 11 s. Arkhiv Muzeiu teatralnoho, muzychnoho i kinomystetstva Ukrainy. Inv. № 42765. 27. Khudozhnyky Mezhyhirskoho khudozhno-keramichnoho tekhnikumu. Lialka Pastor, Lialka Baba, holova lialky. 1923 r. URL: https://artsandculture.google.com/asset/puppet-of-pastor-from-the-mezhyhirya-vertep-artists-of-themezhyhirya-art-and-ceramic-technical-school/HwHUiOIC6e5B8Q?hl=uk; https://artsandculture.google.com/asset/puppet-ofan-old-woman-from-the-mezhyhirya-vertep-artists-of-the-mezhyhirya-art-and-ceramic-technical-school/cQExzssqEes3Zg?hl=uk&ms=%7B%22x%22%3A0.5%2C%22y%22%3A0.5% 2C%22z%22%3A8.279147998795729%2C%22size

%22%3A%7B%22width%22%3A3.8264220561206335%2C%22height%22%3A1.237508237157655%7D%7D

https://artsandculture.google.com/asset/puppet-s-head-from-the-mezhyhirya-vertep-artists-of-the-mezhyhirya-art-andceramic-technical-school/lQHxDyAA GwrNqw?hl=uk (data zvernennia: 20.01.2025 r.).

28. TsDAMLMU, f. 389. Ivanchenko Pavlo Mykhailovych (1898–1990), maister khudozhnoi keramiky. Op. 1, od. zb. 27, ark 1. Pryvit tobi, pryvit, Mezhyhirskyi kolektyv… Rukopys. Na 1 ark.

29. TsDAMLMU, f. 990. Musiienko Panteleimon Nykyforovych (1905–1980), mystetstvoznavets i maister khudozhnoi keramiky. Op. 1, spr. 263, ark. 1–18. Statti pro skulptoriv i rizbiariv. Mezhyhirskyi mystetsko-keramichnyi ta Myrhorodskyi khudozhno-keramichnyi tekhnikumy. Keramika Zakarpattia. Kn. 27. Mashynopys z pravkamy avtora.

30. Shkolna O., Kovalchuk O., Kachurovska D., Pohrebniuk Ya. Pliasky smerti v obrazotvorchomu i dekoratyvnoprykladnomu mystetstvi Yevropy ХIV–ХVIII stolit. Ukrainska kultura: mynule, suchasne, shliakhy rozvytku. 2024. № 48, S. 25–32.

31. Shkolna O. Mezhyhirskyi khudozhno-keramichnyi tekhnikum-instytut. Pamiatky Ukrainy. 2014. №9 (veresen). S. 60–65.

32. Shkolna O. Pavlo Ivanchenko vidomyi i nevidomyi: reaktsiia na stattiu z knyhy Yaroslava Kravchenka «Shkola Mykhaila Boichuka. Trydtsiat sim imen» (Kyiv : Oranta, 2010. S.156–157). Zapysky NTSh. T. CCLXI: Pratsi Komisii obrazotvorchoho ta uzhytkovoho mystetstva / red. O. Kupchynskyi. Lviv, 2011. S. 706–710: il.

Published

2025-03-02

How to Cite

SHKOLNA, O., KRIUKOVA, G., & POPINOVA, O. (2025). DOLLS OF THE MEZHYGIRSKY VERTEP IN THE CREATIVITY OF ARTISTS-BOICHUKISTS OF THE 1920 S . UKRAINIAN CULTURE: THE PAST, MODERN WAYS OF DEVELOPMENT (BRANCH CULTUROLOGY), (50), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.35619/ucpmk.50.934

Issue

Section

HISTORICAL AND ARTISTIC HERITAGE OF UKRAINE IN THE CONTEXT OF THE WORLD CULTURE

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.