CREATIVE CITATION OR PLAGIARISM? ON THE ISSUE OF ARTISTIC ORIGINALITY IN ART EDUCATION

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35619/ucpmk.50.962

Keywords:

fine art, work, plagiarism, idea, composition

Abstract

Topicality. Plagiarism in the field of art is the use of someone else's ideas, compositions, stylistics, or even elements of a work without citing the author or obtaining appropriate permissions, a problem that is increasingly difficult to deal with in educational institutions of artistic direction. Copying, using the concepts of other artists without transformation or presenting them as one's own is happening more and more often.
The purpose of the article is to consider the problem of plagiarism in fine arts, copyright, analyze tracking and possible ways to eliminate cases.
The research methodology is complex and determined by the goal of the article. In the research process, the methods of analysis and synthesis were used, which were applied to consider the theoretical foundations, the comparative method, which was aimed at identifying various aspects of understanding the cause of the problem, as well as the methods of abstraction, generalization, and specification.
Scientific novelty consists in making an attempt to reveal the above-mentioned problem. The work considers the most significant methods and ways of overcoming it.
It is emphasized that visual art owes the initial development of creative plagiarism to mass enthusiasm for networks and applications for artists, although it is known that creative plagiarism took place in the distant times of the Middle Ages and the Renaissance. Over the past few years, the number of works created by artificial intelligence, based on the work of famous artists, has increased. Works of this kind appear more and more often as original works of artists. This phenomenon is especially common among student youth. Stopping and identifying the flow of plagiarism is becoming more and more difficult, and it often becomes a problem for academic supervisors and teachers of art educational institutions.
The conclusions state that the problem of creative plagiarism in fine arts remains unresolved, despite numerous attempts to resolve the situation. The problem harms authors, the artistic community in general, reduces the uniqueness of creativity and violates intellectual property rights. The fight against plagiarism in art requires a complex approach - legal, ethical and technological. Protecting the rights of artists, creating a culture of originality, and implementing modern technologies can help minimize plagiarism.

Author Biographies

Olga KALENYUK, Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University, m. Lutsk, Ukraine

Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Fine Arts Department

Oleksandra PANFILOVA, Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University,m. Lutsk, Ukraine

Candidate of Art History, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Fine Arts 

References

1.Bodriiar J. Simuliakry i simuliatsiia [Simulacra and Simulation] / trans. by V. Khovkhun. Kyiv [Ukraine]:

Solomoniya Pavlychko Publishing House «Osnovy», 2004. 230 p.

2.Burych L. Legal Rules for Creative Professions: Plagiarism or Inspiration? 2020. URL:

https://medium.com/digilaw-ukraine/юридичні-правила-гри-для-творчих-професій-плагіат-чи-натхнення2ef17084a25c (accessed 22 Feb 2025) [Ukraine].

3. Novikova O. Between Original and Copy: Is There Plagiarism in Art? 2023. URL:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8dB7Vv1kzs (accessed 22 Feb 2025) [Ukraine].

4. «Plagiarism or Contemporary Creativity?» URL: https://photoschool.ua/ua/club/articles/1276-plagiarism

(accessed 20 Feb 2025) [Ukraine].

5. 7 Most Common Types of Plagiarism (with Examples). URL: https://smodin.io/blog/uk/types-of-plagiarism/

(accessed 20 Feb 2025) [Unknown].

6. Garrett L., Robinson, A. Spot the Difference! Plagiarism Identification in the Visual Arts. Farnham [UK]:

University for the Creative Arts, 2012. 40 p.

7. Foster H. The Return of the Real: The Avant-Garde at the End of the Century.Cambridge, Mass. [USA]: MIT Press, 1996. 307 p.

8. Kristeva J. Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. New York, NY [USA]: Columbia

University Press, 1980. 9.Barthes R. The Death of the Author. Aspen (5-6), 1967. URL: https:// writing.upenn.edu/~taransky/Barthes.pdf

(accessed 22 Feb 2025) [USA].

Published

2025-05-20

How to Cite

KALENYUK, O., & PANFILOVA, O. (2025). CREATIVE CITATION OR PLAGIARISM? ON THE ISSUE OF ARTISTIC ORIGINALITY IN ART EDUCATION . UKRAINIAN CULTURE: THE PAST, MODERN WAYS OF DEVELOPMENT (, (50), 215–221. https://doi.org/10.35619/ucpmk.50.962

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.