SAANS – CRIMEAN TATARS VARIANT OF TAGINES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35619/ucpmk.50.961

Keywords:

saan, tagine, Crimean Tatar ceramics, metalware, decorative ar, Islamic ornamentation, Crimean Tatar art, pottery, tradition reconstruction, visual culture

Abstract

The aim of this study is to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the Crimean Tatar saan as a local variant of the tagine, within the broader system of Crimean material and artistic culture. The research focuses on the historical origins, functional purpose, ornamental features, and symbolic reinterpretation of saans in both past and contemporary contexts.
Research methodology. The study is based on interdisciplinary methods combining comparative art history, material culture studies, and field research. Particular attention is given to the transformation of North African and Middle Eastern ceramic traditions under the influence of Islamic domestic aesthetics and their adaptation in the Crimean context. Visual analysis of historical specimens and contemporary ceramic reconstructions plays a key role.
Results. The research establishes that saans, although inspired by the tagines of the Maghreb and the Middle East, represent a distinct development in Crimean Tatar material culture. Made traditionally from tinned copper with conical lids and engraved decoration, saans were used exclusively for food serving rather than cooking. Their ornamentation includes vegetal motifs, inscriptions in Arabic calligraphy, and geometric patterns aligned with Islamic concepts of ritual cleanliness and beauty. The loss of the saans tradition during the 20 th century was closely linked to the forced deportation of the Crimean Tatars in 1944. However, in the late 20 th and early 21st centuries, the form was revived by contemporary ceramic artists. Figures such as Rustem Skibin, Abdul Seit-Ametov, Aider Abibulaiev and Eldar Gusenov have reconstructed the saans as a symbol of cultural memory, post-genocide resilience, and national identity.
Novelty. This article presents the first focused scholarly study of saans as a phenomenon of cultural transformation, revealing their significance in preserving Islamic and Crimean Tatar artistic traditions.
Practical significance. The findings contribute to the understanding of traditional forms in modern ceramic practices, educational curricula in art history, and the development of museum and heritage preservation initiatives.

Author Biography

Oleksiy VLASOV, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv Metropolitan University, Kyiv

PhD student, Department of Fine Arts, Faculty of Fine Arts and Design

References

1. Akchurina-Muftiieva N. M. Istoriohrafiia vyvchennia krymskotatarskoho narodnoho dekoratyvnoho mystetstva [Historiography of the Study of Crimean Tatar Folk Decorative Art]. Skhidnyi Svit – The Oriental World. (2007). No. 1. P. 16–22 [in Ukrainian].

2. Vlasov O. A. Krymskotatarski tadzhyny «saany» v konteksti formotvorennia posudu krain Blyzʹkoho Skhodu i Mahrybu [Crimean Tatar Tajines «Saany» in the Context of Vessel Shaping in the Countries of the Middle East and the Maghreb]. In: Etnokulturni tradytsii v obrazotvorchomu mystetstvi ta designi Ukrainy. Materialy Vseukr. nauk.-prakt. konf. Kyivskyi stolychnyi universytet imeni Borysa Hrinchenka (Kyiv, 08 travnia 2024). Kyiv, (2024). P. 12–16 [in Ukrainian].

3. Zaatov I. A. Krymskotatarske obrazotvorche i dekoratyvno-prykladne mystetstvo XX st. (Henezys, evoliutsiia, suchasnyi stan) [Crimean Tatar Fine and Decorative Applied Art of the 20 th Century: Genesis, Evolution, Current State]. Simferopol : Dolia, 2002. 280 p [in Ukrainian].

4. Ibragimova A. M. Bakhchysaraiskyi Khanskyi palats XVI–XVIII st. [The Khan’s Palace in Bakhchisarai (16 th– 18 th c.)]. Instytut arkheolohii NAN Ukrainy. Simferopol : Dolia, 2013. 365 p.: ill. [іn Ukrainian].

5. Skybin R. V. Stvorennia avtorskoho styliu polikhromnoho rozpysu keramichnykh vyrobiv v tradytsiinii kulturi krymskykh tatar [Creation of an Authorial Style of Polychrome Painting in Traditional Crimean Tatar Ceramics]. URL: https://rustemskybin.com/pages/about (accessed: 23.11.2023) [in Ukrainian].

6. Teslenko I. B. Khronolohiia odniiei hrupy kukhonnogo posudu z pam’iatok Krymu XV st. [Chronology of a Group of 15th Century Kitchenware from Crimean Sites]. Arkheolohiia, 2011. No. 4. P. 60–68 [in Ukrainian].

7. Shkolna O. V. Typolohiia ta motyvy ozdoblennia hrupy skhidnoho tonkokeramichnoho posudu krain Kavkazu ta Serednʹoi Azii v XX – na pochatku XXI st. [Typology and Decoration Motifs of Eastern Fine Ceramics of the Caucasus and Central Asia in the 20th – Early 21st Century]. Suchasne Mystetstvo: nauk. zbirnyk. Instytut problem suchasnoho mystetstva NAM Ukrainy. Kyiv : Fenyks, 2016. Issue XII. P. 203–208 [in Ukrainian].

8. Yakubovych M. M. Filosofska dumka Krymskoho khanstva: monohrafiia [Philosophical Thought of the Crimean Khanate: Monograph]. Kyiv : Komora, (2016). 446 p.: col. ill. [in Ukrainian].

9. Brett Michael. «Berber». Encyclopedia Britannica, 7 Mar. (2024). URL: britannica.com/topic/Berber (accessed: 07.05.2024) [in English].

10. Murtoff, ennifer. «Tagine». Encyclopedia Britannica, 26 Jul., 2023. URL: britannica.com/topic/taginecooking-vessel (accessed: 07.05.2024) [in English].

11. Sahih Muslim. 36. The Book of Drinks. (12) Chapter: It is recommended to cover vessels. Reference: Sahih Muslim 2012 a. URL: https:// sunnah.com/muslim:2012a (accessed: 03.05.2024) [in English].

12. Shepard A. O. Ceramics for the Archaeologist. Carnegie Institution of Washington publication. Carnegie Institution of Washington, 1956. 414 p. [in English].

Published

2025-03-25

How to Cite

VLASOV, O. (2025). SAANS – CRIMEAN TATARS VARIANT OF TAGINES. UKRAINIAN CULTURE: THE PAST, MODERN WAYS OF DEVELOPMENT (, (50), 207–212. https://doi.org/10.35619/ucpmk.50.961

Issue

Section

THEORETICAL AND ARTISTIC ASPECTS OF THE UKRAINIAN CULTURE

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.